<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally the Eee PC 901, 1000 and 1000h Get the Official Treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eeepc.net/finally-the-eee-pc-901-1000-and-1000h-gets-the-official-treatment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eeepc.net/finally-the-eee-pc-901-1000-and-1000h-gets-the-official-treatment/</link>
	<description>Blog about Asus Eee PC &#38; other netbooks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Tablets</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/finally-the-eee-pc-901-1000-and-1000h-gets-the-official-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-179187</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Tablets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=397#comment-179187</guid>
		<description>These are fine netbooks.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://encuestaspagas.site11.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ganar dinero con encuestas&lt;/a&gt; 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are fine netbooks.<br />
<a href="http://encuestaspagas.site11.com" rel="nofollow">Ganar dinero con encuestas</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: white loft beds</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/finally-the-eee-pc-901-1000-and-1000h-gets-the-official-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-178621</link>
		<dc:creator>white loft beds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=397#comment-178621</guid>
		<description>7.8 hours of battery life? is that enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7.8 hours of battery life? is that enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: electronics</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/finally-the-eee-pc-901-1000-and-1000h-gets-the-official-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-35364</link>
		<dc:creator>electronics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=397#comment-35364</guid>
		<description>I dont usually comment, but after reading through so much info I had to say thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont usually comment, but after reading through so much info I had to say thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbg</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/finally-the-eee-pc-901-1000-and-1000h-gets-the-official-treatment/comment-page-1/#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>pbg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=397#comment-1413</guid>
		<description>The PC 901 and beyond will disappear without trace within a year!

So once again the geeks and the marketing men have got hold of a great idea and ruined it.

Why was the 700 such an enourmous success? The PRICE! A useful simple solid state portable pc with good battery life and a free OPS.

It has a spec. that could have been written by a user. By someone who actually uses a portable ON BATTERIES.
What it had was needed, not &#039;perceived&#039; to be what everyone wanted.
Things it doesn&#039;t need: Fast processor, short battery life, fast Internet, advanced vide/media player. huge hard drive, masses of ports. game playing, high price tag.
All the things the 901 has got! Keep them cheap, simple, and increase the battery life. Not XP Vista OSX or any of them.

It isn&#039;t even as if anyone hasn&#039;t tried this before: Toshiba, Olivetti, Psion, IBM, Sony and many other have been making ( and stopped making)machines of this size for years and years. What the eee had ( now past tense) was a useful colour wordprocessor with email/web access. What 90% of  users need and use. 
Once you have to plug a portable in it is worthless, we all use our main machine, if you want to watch DVD&#039;s buy a £50 player.

Drop the price of the eee 700 and watch it&#039;s sales take off again!
Anything else is a waste of money, and won&#039;t sell. £300+ for a toy?
Any 901 owners want to buy a boat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PC 901 and beyond will disappear without trace within a year!</p>
<p>So once again the geeks and the marketing men have got hold of a great idea and ruined it.</p>
<p>Why was the 700 such an enourmous success? The PRICE! A useful simple solid state portable pc with good battery life and a free OPS.</p>
<p>It has a spec. that could have been written by a user. By someone who actually uses a portable ON BATTERIES.<br />
What it had was needed, not &#8216;perceived&#8217; to be what everyone wanted.<br />
Things it doesn&#8217;t need: Fast processor, short battery life, fast Internet, advanced vide/media player. huge hard drive, masses of ports. game playing, high price tag.<br />
All the things the 901 has got! Keep them cheap, simple, and increase the battery life. Not XP Vista OSX or any of them.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t even as if anyone hasn&#8217;t tried this before: Toshiba, Olivetti, Psion, IBM, Sony and many other have been making ( and stopped making)machines of this size for years and years. What the eee had ( now past tense) was a useful colour wordprocessor with email/web access. What 90% of  users need and use.<br />
Once you have to plug a portable in it is worthless, we all use our main machine, if you want to watch DVD&#8217;s buy a £50 player.</p>
<p>Drop the price of the eee 700 and watch it&#8217;s sales take off again!<br />
Anything else is a waste of money, and won&#8217;t sell. £300+ for a toy?<br />
Any 901 owners want to buy a boat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 344/345 objects using memcached

Served from: eeepc.net @ 2012-05-24 23:30:24 -->
