Comments on: Fujitsu Officially Announced the M2010 Netbook http://eeepc.net/fujitsu-officially-announced-the-m2010-netbook/ Blog about Asus Eee PC & other netbooks Thu, 24 May 2012 16:40:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: kontor http://eeepc.net/fujitsu-officially-announced-the-m2010-netbook/comment-page-1/#comment-107664 kontor Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:43:38 +0000 http://eeepc.net/?p=4741#comment-107664 thanks...very nice thanks…very nice

]]> By: Fujitsu LifeBook U810 Mini-Laptop http://eeepc.net/fujitsu-officially-announced-the-m2010-netbook/comment-page-1/#comment-42814 Fujitsu LifeBook U810 Mini-Laptop Fri, 01 May 2009 18:03:49 +0000 http://eeepc.net/?p=4741#comment-42814 Pros: -Excellent battery life. You get near to meeting the stated 5hr work time with light usage. Even heavier usage does not seem to drain the battery like some competing machines. -The option for inking or simple typing. I find this to be a great mix. Yes, neither is perfect, but both work well. There is debate about whether Fujitsu has included palm rejection software to make up for not having an active digitizer, and in my experience they either have or have made a great screen. I've been able to ink in all orientations, but my preference is for a hard touch. -The oft hated processor is fine for running XP apps, even doing some multi-tasking. No complaints, though I have realistic expectations. They sure were met considering the crappy configured, Vista store model. If you need to do tons of video editing or other intensive work, I'm still curious why you're looking at these machines. Cons: -Not enough ports! By no means a deal breaker, but I'd take more standard USB ports and a faster SD port. -WiFi stinks in tablet mode. Ordinarily a good reception, never very strong in tablet orientation. -The stylus wasn't made for anyone of normal size. Passable. -Why does the end user have to optimize these machines for their stated purpose? I'm a nerd, I admit it, but don't the companies think a bit more about optimizing an OS for mobile use? And no, I don't want the horrid Windows Mobile on it. -Speaker (yes speaker) sounds like a poor AM radio. Minor quibble. Pros:
-Excellent battery life. You get near to meeting the stated 5hr work time with light usage. Even heavier usage does not seem to drain the battery like some competing machines.
-The option for inking or simple typing. I find this to be a great mix. Yes, neither is perfect, but both work well. There is debate about whether Fujitsu has included palm rejection software to make up for not having an active digitizer, and in my experience they either have or have made a great screen. I’ve been able to ink in all orientations, but my preference is for a hard touch.
-The oft hated processor is fine for running XP apps, even doing some multi-tasking. No complaints, though I have realistic expectations. They sure were met considering the crappy configured, Vista store model. If you need to do tons of video editing or other intensive work, I’m still curious why you’re looking at these machines.

Cons:
-Not enough ports! By no means a deal breaker, but I’d take more standard USB ports and a faster SD port.
-WiFi stinks in tablet mode. Ordinarily a good reception, never very strong in tablet orientation.
-The stylus wasn’t made for anyone of normal size. Passable.
-Why does the end user have to optimize these machines for their stated purpose? I’m a nerd, I admit it, but don’t the companies think a bit more about optimizing an OS for mobile use? And no, I don’t want the horrid Windows Mobile on it.
-Speaker (yes speaker) sounds like a poor AM radio. Minor quibble.

]]>