<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSI Wind PC benchmarked and compared with Eee PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/</link>
	<description>The unofficial blog about Asus Eee PC</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sc</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/#comment-3740</link>
		<dc:creator>sc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=348#comment-3740</guid>
		<description>what the hell are you talking about fj? the msi wind not portable? its only about an inch bigger than the eee. me thinks you bought the eee and are now feeling a little pissed...

msi wind - 10.23"(L) X7.08"(D)

eee pc - 8.9 x 6.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what the hell are you talking about fj? the msi wind not portable? its only about an inch bigger than the eee. me thinks you bought the eee and are now feeling a little pissed&#8230;</p>
<p>msi wind - 10.23&#8243;(L) X7.08&#8243;(D)</p>
<p>eee pc - 8.9 x 6.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 14:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=348#comment-836</guid>
		<description>FJ the MSI Wind is a notebook.
http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/23/msi-wind-to-get-us-release-two-versions-available/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FJ the MSI Wind is a notebook.<br />
<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/23/msi-wind-to-get-us-release-two-versions-available/" rel="nofollow">http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/05/23/msi-wind-to-get-us-release-two-versions-available/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FJ</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>FJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 12:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=348#comment-835</guid>
		<description>I don't understand why we are comparing the performance of the MSI Wind PC, which is clearly a desktop computer, NOT a laptop, with a bunch of low-powered laptops.

The performance of the EeePC and Vaio is poor because they are very low powered devices which need to run on battery most of the time.

The MSI Wind PC, as you can see from all the photos, is a desktop computer.  It's not portable, and runs from mains power.  I don't see a fair comparison at all.

Why such a low powered processor in a desktop computer anyway?  A desktop version of the EeePC is out soon (EBox?), and it will have performance an order of magnitude better than the EeePC.  Surely this is what the MSI Wind PC should be compared to, not the EeePC laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why we are comparing the performance of the MSI Wind PC, which is clearly a desktop computer, NOT a laptop, with a bunch of low-powered laptops.</p>
<p>The performance of the EeePC and Vaio is poor because they are very low powered devices which need to run on battery most of the time.</p>
<p>The MSI Wind PC, as you can see from all the photos, is a desktop computer.  It&#8217;s not portable, and runs from mains power.  I don&#8217;t see a fair comparison at all.</p>
<p>Why such a low powered processor in a desktop computer anyway?  A desktop version of the EeePC is out soon (EBox?), and it will have performance an order of magnitude better than the EeePC.  Surely this is what the MSI Wind PC should be compared to, not the EeePC laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joey-Elijah</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>joey-Elijah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 03:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=348#comment-832</guid>
		<description>The MSI wind is still a bang-for-buck better deal than the ever increasing priced Eeepc 901.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MSI wind is still a bang-for-buck better deal than the ever increasing priced Eeepc 901.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
