<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eee PC &#187; 1.86GHz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eeepc.net/tag/186ghz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eeepc.net</link>
	<description>Blog about Asus Eee PC &#38; other netbooks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:51:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://eeepc.net/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>1.86GHz Intel Atom processors would be nice, except they&#8217;re twice as expensive as 1.6GHz ones</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/186ghz-intel-atom-processors-would-be-nice-except-theyre-twice-as-expensive-as-16ghz-ones/</link>
		<comments>http://eeepc.net/186ghz-intel-atom-processors-would-be-nice-except-theyre-twice-as-expensive-as-16ghz-ones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Gonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1.86GHz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Z530]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Z540]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=3859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While you may be satisfied with what you&#8217;re getting in a 1.6GHz Intel Atom processor-equipped netbook, did you know that you could have had the same netbook with a slightly better processor that&#8217;s clocked at 1.86GHz? Yes, a 1.86GHz Intel Atom processor is available in the form of the Intel Atom Z540, but manufacturers aren&#8217;t [...]<p><a href="http://eeepc.net/186ghz-intel-atom-processors-would-be-nice-except-theyre-twice-as-expensive-as-16ghz-ones/">1.86GHz Intel Atom processors would be nice, except they&#8217;re twice as expensive as 1.6GHz ones</a> is a post from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://eeepc.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/intel_atom1.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p><img src="http://eeepc.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/intel_atom1.jpg" alt="intel_atom" title="intel_atom" width="300" height="372" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3860" /><br />
While you may be satisfied with what you&#8217;re getting in a 1.6GHz Intel Atom processor-equipped netbook, did you know that you could have had the same netbook with a slightly better processor that&#8217;s clocked at 1.86GHz? Yes, a 1.86GHz Intel Atom processor is available in the form of the Intel Atom Z540, but manufacturers aren&#8217;t in a hurry to offer this variant of the Atom in their products. Why? Because it costs more&#8211;twice more, to be exact&#8211;than the 1.6GHz Intel Atom processor. Yes, it offers a higher CPU clock speed, but at a 100% increase in price, it&#8217;s hard to say it will be worth it, especially since netbooks with 1.6GHz Atoms seem to be doing pretty well in the market. Here&#8217;s hoping Intel wakes up to reality and lowers their price for these, so we can, you know, experience using it in future netbooks to see if it&#8217;s really any better.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=2234X572204&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fudzilla.com%2Findex.php%3Foption%3Dcom_content%26%23038%3Btask%3Dview%26%23038%3Bid%3D12502%26%23038%3BItemid%3D41&sref=rss">Fudzilla</a></p>
<p><a href="http://eeepc.net/186ghz-intel-atom-processors-would-be-nice-except-theyre-twice-as-expensive-as-16ghz-ones/">1.86GHz Intel Atom processors would be nice, except they&#8217;re twice as expensive as 1.6GHz ones</a> is a post from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a></p>
<hr />
<p><small>Link to post: <a href="http://eeepc.net/186ghz-intel-atom-processors-would-be-nice-except-theyre-twice-as-expensive-as-16ghz-ones/">1.86GHz Intel Atom processors would be nice, except they&#8217;re twice as expensive as 1.6GHz ones</a> - from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a> | <a href="http://eeepc.net/186ghz-intel-atom-processors-would-be-nice-except-theyre-twice-as-expensive-as-16ghz-ones/#comments">3 comments</a> | © <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=2234X572204&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.admarket.se%2F&sref=rss">Admarket</a>, 2009.</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eeepc.net/186ghz-intel-atom-processors-would-be-nice-except-theyre-twice-as-expensive-as-16ghz-ones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

