<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eee PC &#187; benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eeepc.net/tag/benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eeepc.net</link>
	<description>Blog about Asus Eee PC &#38; other netbooks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://eeepc.net/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung NC20 battery life benchmarked</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/samsung-nc20-battery-life-benchmarked/</link>
		<comments>http://eeepc.net/samsung-nc20-battery-life-benchmarked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Gonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nc20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung nc20]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=3385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you were curious about the Samsung NC20&#8242;s battery life, and wanted to know if it was any better than that of the Samsung NC10, NetbookNews.de has posted a short Samsung NC20 battery life benchmarking story which shows how long the NC20 lasts on a single charge in different situations. With all the setting [...]<p><a href="http://eeepc.net/samsung-nc20-battery-life-benchmarked/">Samsung NC20 battery life benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://eeepc.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/samsung-nc20-battery-life1.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p><img src="http://eeepc.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/samsung-nc20-battery-life1.jpg" alt="samsung-nc20-battery-life" title="samsung-nc20-battery-life" width="500" height="375" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3386" /><br />
In case you were curious about the Samsung NC20&#8242;s battery life, and wanted to know if it was any better than that of the Samsung NC10, NetbookNews.de has posted a short <a href="http://eeepc.net/tag/nc20">Samsung NC20</a> battery life benchmarking story which shows how long the NC20 lasts on a single charge in different situations. With all the setting maxed and wireless connectivity on, the Samsung NC20 achieved just a little over 2 hours of battery life. While a standard test yielded exactly 4 hours of juice. Not bad for a battery that&#8217;s bundled with the device. It should last longer with aftermarket 6-cell batteries, but the point is this: the Samsung NC20 provides great battery life out of the box, which is a good thing for mobile computing enthusiasts who are eyeing to get this 12-inch netbook.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=2234X572204&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftranslate.google.com%2Ftranslate%3Fsl%3Dauto%26%23038%3Btl%3Den%26%23038%3Bu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Ffeedproxy.google.com%252F%7Er%252FAsusEeePcNews%252F%7E3%252FFHJ0hA6gNjE%252F&sref=rss">NetbookNews.de</a></p>
<p><a href="http://eeepc.net/samsung-nc20-battery-life-benchmarked/">Samsung NC20 battery life benchmarked</a> is a post from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a></p>
<hr />
<p><small>Link to post: <a href="http://eeepc.net/samsung-nc20-battery-life-benchmarked/">Samsung NC20 battery life benchmarked</a> - from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a> | <a href="http://eeepc.net/samsung-nc20-battery-life-benchmarked/#comments">2 comments</a> | © <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=2234X572204&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.admarket.se%2F&sref=rss">Admarket</a>, 2009.</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eeepc.net/samsung-nc20-battery-life-benchmarked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSI Wind PC benchmarked and compared with Eee PC</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 09:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSI Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eee PC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Japanese Impress benchmarked latest MSI Wind PC and compared the performance with the other most popular mini laptops on the market. Main test was performance of the Intel&#8217;s Atom processors with typical ULV Core 2 Duo found in ASUS Eee PC models and Sony Vaio VGN-TZ90S with Intel Core 2 Duo ULV U7600. Leaving aside [...]<p><a href="http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/">MSI Wind PC benchmarked and compared with Eee PC</a> is a post from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://eeepc.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/atom-vs-celeron-vs-core-2-duo1.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><div><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-349" title="atom-vs-celeron-vs-core-2-duo" src="http://eeepc.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/atom-vs-celeron-vs-core-2-duo1.jpg" alt="" width="453" height="312" /></div>
<div>
</div>
<p>Japanese Impress benchmarked latest MSI Wind PC and compared the performance with the other most popular mini laptops on the market.</p>
<p>Main test was performance of the Intel&#8217;s Atom processors with typical ULV Core 2 Duo found in ASUS Eee PC models and Sony Vaio VGN-TZ90S with Intel Core 2 Duo ULV U7600.</p>
<p>Leaving aside the performance of integrated graphics and storage, clearly influenced by the type of hard disk or SSD installed, it is curious to note how Atom Z520 from 1.33GHz is unable to compete against the Celeron M 353 from 900MHz Asus Eee PC 900. via [<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=2234X572204&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2F64.233.179.104%2Ftranslate_c%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fpc.watch.impress.co.jp%252Fdocs%252F2008%252F0519%252Fmsi2.htm%26amp%3Blangpair%3Dja%257Cen%26amp%3Bhl%3Den%26amp%3Bie%3DUTF8&sref=rss">Impress</a>]</p>
<div></div>
<p><a href="http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/">MSI Wind PC benchmarked and compared with Eee PC</a> is a post from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a></p>
<hr />
<p><small>Link to post: <a href="http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/">MSI Wind PC benchmarked and compared with Eee PC</a> - from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a> | <a href="http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/#comments">4 comments</a> | © <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=2234X572204&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.admarket.se%2F&sref=rss">Admarket</a>, 2008.</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eeepc.net/msi-wind-pc-benchmarked-and-compared-with-eee-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/25 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 1013/1065 objects using memcached

Served from: eeepc.net @ 2012-05-25 19:18:34 -->
