<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Eee PC &#187; psion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eeepc.net/tag/psion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eeepc.net</link>
	<description>Blog about Asus Eee PC &#38; other netbooks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:51:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://eeepc.net/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Psion countersues Intel in ongoing &#8220;netbook&#8221; patent claim</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/psion-countersues-intel-in-ongoing-netbook-patent-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://eeepc.net/psion-countersues-intel-in-ongoing-netbook-patent-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Gonzales</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[countersue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=3647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an ongoing effort to protect its supposed patent for the now generic term &#8220;netbook,&#8221; Psion has countersued Intel and has charged the company with Trademark Infringement Under The Lanham Act, Common Law Unfair Competition, and Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, among other charges. Psion has also demanded a &#8220;trial by jury on all issues triable [...]<p><a href="http://eeepc.net/psion-countersues-intel-in-ongoing-netbook-patent-claim/">Psion countersues Intel in ongoing &#8220;netbook&#8221; patent claim</a> is a post from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://eeepc.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/psion-netbook-counteruse1.png" width="240" />
		</p><p><img src="http://eeepc.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/psion-netbook-counteruse1.png" alt="psion-netbook-counteruse" title="psion-netbook-counteruse" width="400" height="222" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3648" /><br />
In an ongoing effort to protect its supposed patent for the now generic term &#8220;netbook,&#8221; Psion has countersued Intel and has charged the company with Trademark Infringement Under The Lanham Act, Common Law Unfair Competition, and Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, among other charges. Psion has also demanded a &#8220;trial by jury on all issues triable by right to a jury.&#8221; This whole issue is slowly getting ugly. Why can&#8217;t we just get along with a name and move on to making great new products that people will actually care about and use to make their lives better, eh Psion?</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=2234X572204&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.savethenetbooks.com%2F2009%2F03%2Fnewsflash-intel-counter-sued-by-psion.html&sref=rss">Save the netbooks</a></p>
<p><a href="http://eeepc.net/psion-countersues-intel-in-ongoing-netbook-patent-claim/">Psion countersues Intel in ongoing &#8220;netbook&#8221; patent claim</a> is a post from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a></p>
<hr />
<p><small>Link to post: <a href="http://eeepc.net/psion-countersues-intel-in-ongoing-netbook-patent-claim/">Psion countersues Intel in ongoing &#8220;netbook&#8221; patent claim</a> - from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a> | <a href="http://eeepc.net/psion-countersues-intel-in-ongoing-netbook-patent-claim/#comments">3 comments</a> | © <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=2234X572204&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.admarket.se%2F&sref=rss">Admarket</a>, 2009.</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eeepc.net/psion-countersues-intel-in-ongoing-netbook-patent-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel&#8217;s Turn to Get Back at Psion</title>
		<link>http://eeepc.net/intels-turn-to-get-back-at-psion/</link>
		<comments>http://eeepc.net/intels-turn-to-get-back-at-psion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arnold Zafra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepc.net/?p=3546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember the issue thrown by Psion regarding their rights on the term &#8220;netbook&#8221;? This has led Dell recently to file a legal action against Psion claiming that although Psion may have trademarked the term and used it to refer to its handheld computer sometime in the 1990&#8242;s it has since then stopped manufacturing machines referring [...]<p><a href="http://eeepc.net/intels-turn-to-get-back-at-psion/">Intel&#8217;s Turn to Get Back at Psion</a> is a post from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the issue thrown by Psion regarding their rights on the term &#8220;netbook&#8221;? This has led Dell recently to file a legal action against Psion claiming that although Psion may have trademarked the term and used it to refer to its handheld computer sometime in the 1990&#8242;s it has since then stopped manufacturing machines referring to them as netbook.</p>
<p>This claim was given a new support by no less than<a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=2234X572204&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reghardware.co.uk%2F2009%2F02%2F25%2Fintel_sues_psion%2F&sref=rss"> Intel which also filed a case.</a> According to an Intel statement, the term &#8220;netbook&#8221; was already adopted by the consumers to refer to computing machines which were extensions of notebooks. In short, Psion&#8217;s claim that the term netbook is generic no longer holds true since it is now the accepted terminology for such computers.</p>
<p>Intel also pointed out that the despite the 30 million hits generated by the search term &#8220;netbook&#8221; on Google search results page, none of these hits created a confusion as to the real meaning of the term. In fact, none of the hits referred to Psions&#8217; &#8220;netbooks&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://eeepc.net/intels-turn-to-get-back-at-psion/">Intel&#8217;s Turn to Get Back at Psion</a> is a post from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a></p>
<hr />
<p><small>Link to post: <a href="http://eeepc.net/intels-turn-to-get-back-at-psion/">Intel&#8217;s Turn to Get Back at Psion</a> - from: <a href="http://eeepc.net">Eee PC</a> | <a href="http://eeepc.net/intels-turn-to-get-back-at-psion/#comments">No comments</a> | © <a href="http://redirectingat.com?id=2234X572204&xs=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.admarket.se%2F&sref=rss">Admarket</a>, 2009.</small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eeepc.net/intels-turn-to-get-back-at-psion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

